Politicization phase (1973-present)
The environment
Main contribution: FASB (Financial Accounting Standard
Board) and various pressure groups are moving towards politicization of accounting.
How the idea of
politicization is started? Reasons:
- Limitations of both professional associations and management in formulating an accounting theory
- Created by the generally accepted view that accounting numbers affect economic behavior
Horngren statement:
relationship between standards and political elements
The setting of standards is a social decision. That is why it
is said to be a product of political action. He further define standards is
define as to place a restrictions on behaviour. It must be accepted by affected
parties to be stated as standards even though the way is to force or by
voluntary or both.
FASB quasi and
deductive political approach adoption has a political elements:
- An effort to develop a theoretical framework @ accounting constitutions
- By emergence of various interest groups, the contribution of which is required for the “general acceptance” of new standards.
Statements by FASB
about the political elements
Setting standard is the same as democratic process, similarly
it can be described as legislative because it must be deliberative &
because all views must be heard. And the standards setter must represent the
entire constituency as a whole and not be representatives of a specific
constituent group.
“Metcalf report”
better expressed the process of formulating accounting standards
The report charged that the ‘big
eight’ accounting firms monopolize the auditing of large corporations and
control the standard setting process. The “big eight” and AICPA have control
over accounting standards approved by SEC. (you may want to search: the
recommendations aimed at enhancing corporate accountability)
No comments:
Post a Comment